KONTRA PERSEPSI ASAS KEBEBASAN BERKONTRAK DALAM UU NO 2 TAHUN 1960 TENTANG BAGI HASIL PERTANIAN DENGAN SISTEM IJON  (Penyuluhan Hukum Pada Masyarakat di Desa Kaidundu Kecamatan Bulawa Kabupaten Boen Bolango Provinsi Gorontalo)

Dolot Alhasni Bakung; Sri Nanang Meiske Kamba; Mohamad Hidayat Muhtar; Zamroni Abdussamad; Julius T. Mandjo

doi:10.59024/jnb.v1i3.164

Authors

Dolot Alhasni Bakung Universitas Negeri Gorontalo
Sri Nanang Meiske Kamba Universitas Negeri Gorontalo
Mohamad Hidayat Muhtar Universitas Negeri Gorontalo
Zamroni Abdussamad Universitas Negeri Gorontalo
Julius T. Mandjo Universitas Negeri Gorontalo

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59024/jnb.v1i3.164

Keywords:

Ijon, Constitution, Freedom of contract principle

Abstract

The implementation of the ijon system by the community, especially farmers, has become a habit that has been passed down from generation to generation and has become entrenched in a number of areas, including Gorontalo. The 1945 Constitution, especially in Article 18B paragraph two (2) which reads that the State recognizes and respects customary law community units along with their traditional rights as long as they are still alive and in accordance with the development of society and the principles of the Unitary State of the Republic of Indonesia, which is regulated in law. Even so, buying and selling under the debt bondage system, in the eyes of the law, is strictly prohibited because in buying and selling the bonded bond system is very unclear because this is a form of extortion that can harm other people. The sale and purchase of the ijon system has also been confirmed in article 8 paragraph 3 of Law number 2 of 1960 concerning production sharing agreements, which reads: "payments by anyone, including owners and cultivators, to cultivators or owners in whatever form they have elements of ijon, are prohibited". The provisions used as the legal basis for the use of standard contracts in Indonesia are Article 1338 Paragraph (1) of the Civil Code which stipulates: "all agreements made legally apply as laws for those who make them" from the words all can be interpreted that every legal subject can make an agreement with any content, there is freedom of the legal subject to determine the form of the agreement. In other words, through the principle of freedom of contract, legal subjects have the freedom to make agreements, including opening opportunities for legal subjects to make new agreements that have not been regulated in the Civil Code so that they can follow the needs of society due to the times

References

Abdulkadir Muhammad, Hukum dan Penelitian Hukum. Cet. 1. Bandung: PT. Citra Aditya Bakti, 2004.

Nico Ngani, A. Qiron Melialala, Sewa Beli Dalam Teori dan Praktek, (Yogyakarta, PT Libert)

Peter Mahmud Marzuki, penelitian hukum, Jakarta: PT kencana prenada media group,

Peter Mahmud Marzuki, Penelitian Hukum, Kencana Prenada Media Group, Jakarta, 2011,

R. Subekti dan R. tjirosudibio, Kitab undang-undang Hukum Perdata, (Jakarta: PT Pradnya Paramita,2009),

Soerjono Soekanto dan Sri Mamudji, Penelitian Hukum Normatif Tinjauan Singkat Jakarata: Rajawali Pers, 2006,

Subekti, Aneka perjanjian, (Bandung: PT citra aditya bakti, 1989)

wirjono prodjodikoro, Hukum perdata tentang hak atas benda, (Jakarta: PT intermasa, 1986)

Zainudin Ali, Metode penelitian hukum, jakarta: PT Sinar grafika.

Undang-Undang Dasar 1946

Undang-undang UU No.2 Tahun 1960 tentang Perjanjian Bagi Hasil Tanah Pertanian diperuntukan untuk mengatur perjanjian pengusahaan tanah dengan bagi hasil.